Eurovision Song Contest: Should they go back to the old jury decision instead of public voting?

I don't like public voting, because the people in other nations don't seem to appreciate British talent, and we end up as losers every time.


Should they use the good old jury again, who can really judge about a good song, rather than that stupid majority vote??

Eurovision Song Contest: Should they go back to the old jury decision instead of public voting?
i totally agree. I think that it's unfair that the eastern europeans are voting for each other but I don't think a panel of judges will make much difference. They won't nescesarily vote for the best, And they would be exposed to a lot of bribes and threats from other countires. If a judge gave a neighbouring country "0" then they would have problems with passports security etc. so what I think we should do is Put restrictions on voting so as to stop all formerly occupied countries vote for the russians and the eastern ones voting for themselves.
Reply:The change of the voting system/introducing judge panels will NEVER change anything, it's just about sending in world-class artists and not all those unknown acts! It's as simple as that, because world-class music is currently completely outside the ESC!!!
Reply:of course!any idiot with money can win just with anyone with money:P

safety boots